Social Scientist. v 9, no. 103 (Dec 1981) p. 12.

Graphics file for this page

Once Again on Castes and Classes

READERS of the Social Scientist will recall my article on "Castes, Classes and Parlies in Modern iP./'iical Development".3 Ramakrishna Mukherjcc, in a recent amide,-i assumed that I based myself on Beteille's book, Caste, C^ass and Po\ver. In a short letter to the editor n I tried to show th'^l . i.' coiiclusions drawn in my paper were independent of BeteilL; in Fie., I b iscd myself on what I learnt in the coi^se of my own priciical activity, supplemented by what humble th.ovilc work I lin/^bccn able to do.

A f^w weeks e.u.i?^ I hid come across a booklet, Class-Caste Struggle:Emerging Thsrd Force, by V T Rajasekhara Shetty, published by the D.Jit Action Committee of KLaraataki. In the author s introduction to the booklet it was claimed, "Even EMS for the fiirst time w^as forcjd to admit thu the CP1 (M) had committed a fundamental blunder".

The "blunder" apparently was that 1 have been carrying on my practical and theoretical work on the basis of the Mraxist theory of class struggle; the alleged "admission of my blunder" consisted in the abandonment of the Marxist theory of class struggle in favour of Slietty's own theory of "Class-Caste Struggle" which is "superior" to Marxism! In another booklet. How Marx Failed in Hindu India, Shetty has propounded his view on the superiority of his own to Marx's theory! I am supposed to have given up Marx and become a disciple of

Back to Social Scientist | Back to the DSAL Page

This page was last generated on Wednesday 12 July 2017 at 13:02 by
The URL of this page is: