Social Scientist. v 11, no. 126 (Nov 1983) p. 55.


Graphics file for this page
LABOUR MOVEMENT 55

revolutionary proletarian class ideology, notwithstanding the inspiration they drew from the Russian Revolution, it marked the first steps in the development of a prolaterian class consciousness and an organised struggle of the workers.

1 Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India, 1931, p 14.

2 M C Shantha, "State and Industry in Madras 1800-1940", thesis submitted to the University of Madras for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1966, pp 26-27.

3 See also in this connection the Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India, pp 14-16.

4 Romesh Dutt, The Economic History of India, New Delhi, 1970, p 185.

5 A Saradaraju, Economic Conditions in the Madras Presidency 1800-1850, University of Madras, 1941, vol I, pp 174, 179-180.

6 B P Wadia, Labour in Madras, Madras, 1921. p 205.

7 D Spencer Hatch, Up from Poverty in Rural India, Madras, 1936, p 3.

8 B P Wadio, op cit., p 178.

9 G 0 No 1029, Public Department (confidential), November 9, 1918, pp 2-14.

10 Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India, pp 44-45.

11 Personal interview with Chelvapathy Chetty (one of the founders of the Madras Labour Union), Madras, June 9, 1981.

12 Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India, p 204.

13 Ibid,? 200.

14 Personal interview with Ghelvapthy Chetty, Madras, June 9, 1981.

15 Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India, pp 198 and 203.

16 Ibid, p 206.

17 The average number of persons in a working class family in Madras excluding dependents was 6.03. Report on the Enpuiry into the Family Budgets of Industrial Workers in Madras city, in G 0 No 2899, Development Department, November 21, 1938, p 146.

18 B P Wadia, op cit, p 180.

19 Report on the Enquiry into the Family Budgets of Industrial Workers in Madras city, 1935-1936, in G 0 No 2899, D D., November 21, 1938, p 9.

20 Ibid, p 40.

21 Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India, p 226.

22 Personal interview with Antony Pillai, a leading trade union leader in Madras, Madras, February 27, 1983.

23 Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India pp 224-225.

24 B P Wadia, op cit, pp 27 and 107-108.

25 G 0 No 164, D D, February 19, 1918, p 9. A pass was given to every 27 men to use a latrine in the Buckingham and Carnatic Mills. When one was inside the latrine, no oilier man was permitted to enter it as a rule even under emergency. Andhra Patrika, January 8, 1918.

26 G 0 No 164, P FJ. February 19, 1918, pp 9-10.

27 Report on the Enquiry into Family Budgets of Industrial Worker in Madras city in G 0 No 2899, D D, November 21, 1938, p 50. ,

28 Ibid, p 146.

29 Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India, p 271.

30 B P Wadia, op cit, pp 232-233.

31 Report of the Unemployment Committee 1926-1927, Madras, 1927, vol III, p 384.

32 International Labour Office, The Workers Standard of Living, Geneva, 1938, p 88.

33 P B Sinha, Indian National Liberation Movement and Russia, 1905-1917, New Delhi, 1975, p 195.

34 Thiru Vi Ka, Valkaikurippukkal, Madras, vol I, p 454.



Back to Social Scientist | Back to the DSAL Page

This page was last generated on Wednesday 12 July 2017 at 18:02 by dsal@uchicago.edu
The URL of this page is: https://dsal.uchicago.edu/books/socialscientist/text.html