Social Scientist. v 16, no. 158 (July 1986) p. 69.


Graphics file for this page
THE COCONUT ECONOMY OF KERALA 69

But his profit from coconut cultivation is quite meagre. It is only Rs. 1076. He meets the substantial portion of his household expenditure from non-agricultural source.

Household expenditure Rs. 15612 Remittance from Kuwait Rs. 13800

With this farmer we find that Rs. 752 is paid for chemical fertilizers. Thus due to the high price of chemical fertilizers, the cost of production for the small farmer has increased substantially.

Medium Farmer

This medium farmer has a total of 1.62 hectares of land. Out of this .81 hectare is coconut garden. His profit and cost of production is as follows :

Gross revenue ==Rs. Paid cost of production 7603 Rs. 2169

Of which : Tilling cost Rs. 240

Chemical fertilizer Rs. 750

Chemical fertilizer application labour cost Rs. 150

Farm yard manure Rs. 24

Farm yard manure application labour cost Rs. 30

Plucking charges Rs. 420

Gathering labour cost Rs. 210

Taking pits labour cost Rs. 300

Irrigation cost Rs. 45

Net profit Rs. 5434

In this case this farmer met most of his household expenditure of Rs. 5884 from his profit from coconut of Rs. 5434. This farmer also had taken a loan of Rs. 12,000 for which he was giving an interest of Rs. 2160. His imputed production costs are following :

. Imputed production cost Farm yard manure Farm yard manure application labour cost Gathering labour cost Rs.430 Rs. 220 Rs. 105 Rs. 105

Large Farmer

This large farmer has garden land of 4.31 hectares. This fanner had the following costs of production and profit.



Back to Social Scientist | Back to the DSAL Page

This page was last generated on Wednesday 12 July 2017 at 18:02 by dsal@uchicago.edu
The URL of this page is: https://dsal.uchicago.edu/books/socialscientist/text.html