SOME PROBLEMS RELATING TO HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL EXPANSION 81 332; SRBG (NS) CXXIII, Revision of Assessment in Six Talukas of the Ahmednagar Collector ate, 1854, pp. 25-26, 52, etc. 9. East India Papers, Vol. 4, p. 686; A.M. Deshpande, 'The Nature of Bhil Unrest in the Early 19th Century Maharashtra', Pune University, Mimeo, 1985. 10. Report of the Kamatak Provincial Congress Committee on Agrarian Distress in Sirsi and Siddapur, Dharwar, 1931, p. 6. 11. M.N. Desai, Life and Living in Rural Karnatak, Sirsi, 1945, p. 37. 12. L.B. Jagalpure and K.D. Kale, Sarola Kasar: Study of a Deccan Village in the Famine Zone, Ahmednagar, 1938, p. 191. 13. Report on Baglan Situation by Non-Brahmin Leader's Committee, Poona, 1929, pp. 12-13. 14. Indian Famine Commission, 1901, Vol. II, Evidence by J.W. Mollison, Dy. Director of Agriculture, Bombay, pp. 91-120. 15. 'Final Report of Famine Relief in the Bombay Presidency during 1918-19' in Dept. of Rev. and Agriculture (Famine Br.) Progs, for Nov. 1921, No. 2, Part B, Appx. 14. 16. Rev. Dept. Vol. 146A of 1881, Compilation No. 1362, Acting Commissioner, S.D. to the Mamlatdar of Ron dt. 27th December, 1880. 17. G. Keatinge, op. cit., pp. 120-124. 18. Dept. of Rev. <& Ag. (Famine Br.) Prog. for November 1921, No. 2, Part B. 19. H.H. Mann, The Social Framework of Agriculture: India, Middle East, England, Bombay, 1967, pp. 250-251. 20. Memo. by Auckland Colvin dt. 8th November 1875, para 8 in Deccan Riots Commission: Memo., Evidence etc., Bombay, 1876. 21. Rev. Dept. Vol. 146A, Compilation 1362 of the year 1881. 22. SRBG (NS) DLXXVHI, p. 2; DLXVJJJ, pp. 2-3; DLXXXIJ, p. 2; DLXXXIII, p. 2; DCXIV, p. 3, etc. 23. J. Mollison, A Textbook on Indian Agriculture, Vol. I, Bombay, 1901, pp. 45-49. 24. Ibid.,p.S8. 25. The evidence is numerous, for instance, SRBG (NS) DCI, p. 2; DXI, p. 3; DLXVIII, p. 3; DV, p. 15, etc. 26. J.A. Voelcker, Report on the Improvement of Indian Agriculture, London, 1893, pp. 99-100,103; paras 121-125. 27. Rev. Dept. Vol. 59, Compilation 1849 of the year 1883; and Vol. 20, Compilation 320 of the year 1891; Annual Report of the Dept. of Agriculture, Bombay, 1889, para 39; ibid. for the year 1897-98, para 68. 28. Voelcker's Report, op. cit., pp. 39, 113-14; J. Mollison, op. cit., p. 86; Royal Commission on Agriculture in India 1928, p. 92; K.L. Datta, Report on the Enquiry into the Rise of Prices in India, 1914, p. 124. 29. Annual Report of the Dept. of Agr. for 1913-14, p. 3. 30. Royal Commission on Agriculture, op. cit., p. 95. 31. Bulletin No. 84 of the Agriculture Research Institute, Calcutta, 1918, Evidence by G.F. Keatinge, Director of Agriculture, Bombay, p. 30. 32. H.H. Mann, The Social Framework. . . ., op. cit., p. 283. 33. H.F. Beale, Report on the Irrigation Works in the Bombay Presidency, Bombay, 1901, Statements No. 2-3. 34. Peasant Enquiry Report of the MPCC, op. cit., pp. 85-87. 35. Ibid, pp. 82-83. 36. D.R. Gadgil, Economic Effects of Irrigation, Poona, 1948, pp. 47, 54, 63. 37. Royal Commission on Agriculture. . ., op. dt., p. 326. 38. Rev. Dept. Vol. 36, Compilation 280 of the year 1884; ibid.. Vol. 36, Compilation 1523 of 1886; J. Mollison, op. cit. Vol. I, pp. 135-69; G. Keatinge, op. cit, p. 132. The references are also to be found in all district Gazetteers of Bombay Presidency. 39. H.H. Mann, The Lines of Development of Indian Agriculture', in The Mysore Economic Journal, Vol. 1,1915, pp. 11-18. 40. Annual Report of the Dept. of Agr. for Bombay Presidency, 1929-30, p. 26. 41. Voelcker's Report, op. cit, p. 223; J. Mollison, op. cit., p. 135; Land. Rev. Admn. Report for Bombay Presidency 1914-15, Part II, p. 18; Sumit Guha, op. cit., p. 198, also holds similar opinion. 42. Sumit Guha, op. dt., p. 196. 43. It was pointed out by Georg Lukacs, that, 'Technique is a part, a moment, naturally of great importance, of the social productive forces, but it is neither simply identical with them, nor the final or absolute moment of the changes in these forces. This attempt to find the underlying determinants of society and its development in a