40 SOCIAL SCIENTIST 15. 'On the Party's Tasks in Fundamentally Restructuring Management of the Economy', Moscow June 25,1987, p. 30. 16. Ibid., p. 37. 17. E. Rudneva, Instrument gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya ekonomiki, plan.khoz. 1989/6, p.26. 18. Ibid. 19. M. Ivanchenko, V.—0 kontseptsii gosudarstvennogo Zakaza, palm. khoz. 1989/7, p. 44. 20. R. Belousov, Razvitie otnoshenii sohstvennosti i upravleniya. vop.ekon, 1989/6, p. 80. 21. V. Smirnov, A. Vissarionov, and S. Sinel'nikov, Sovershenstvovani.e planirovaniya v novyikh usioviyakh khoziaistvovaniya, plan.khoz. 1989/7, p33. 22. V. Korovkin, Perestroika in der sowjetischen Wrtsohaft: Bilanz einer widespruchsvollen Entwicklung. Osteuropa; Wirtschaft, 1/1992, p. 54. 23. Arendnyi podriyad—Kratochaishii put'k prodovolstvennomu dostatku. Moscow 1988, p. 7. 24. I. Filalotchev, T. Buck, and M. Wright, 'Privatization and Buy-outs in the USSR' in Soviet Studies, 2,1992, p. 275. 25. Please see my article, 'Reflections on Economic Reform in Hungary' Social Scientist, 1990, for a detailed description. 26. 'Ekonomika i zhizn' no. 51/1990, p. 5 of the supplement. 27. Please see Pravda from 14.12.89 to 20.12.89. 28. Korovkin, op.dt., p. 57. 29. G. Calvo, and F. Coricelli, 'Stagflationary Effects of Stabilization Programs in Reforming Socialist Countries: Enterprize-side and Household-side Factors'., The World Bank Economic Review, January 1992, p. 79. 30. Documents and Materials of 28th Party Congress of CPSU, July 1990, Moscow, p.76. 31. E. Primakov, V. Martynov, and G. Diligenskii, Nekotorye problemy novogo myshlenii-Mirovaya ekonomika i mazhdunarodnye otnosheniya (henceforth dted as ME and MO), 1989/6, p. 5. 32. V. Alukov, Dialektika tselostnogo mira i novoe myshlenie, ME and MO, 1989/9, p. 54. 33. Primakov et al, op.dt, p. 11. 34. Altukov op.dt. p. 57. 35. Ibid., p. 61. 36. Ibid, p. 55. 37. S. Lavrov and- S. Prikhod'ko, Problemy sozdaniya zon sovstmennogo predprinimatel'stva. vop.ekon. 1990/6, p. 101. 38. Korovkin—op.dt., 60. 39. Ekonomika i Zhizn' (henceforth mentioned as £Z, December 1990, no. 51, p. 4. From the end of 1990 to the days of disintegration of Soviet sodalism, this was the only journal which presented before the readers various viewpoints on theoretical and practical issues, on dedsions of government and party, the problems of the economy, the solutions sought, the politico-economic atmosphere and so on. The entire subsection dealing with the period has been written on the basis of materials from this journal. Even sdentific economic journals of repute like 'Planovoe khoziaistvo' and 'Voprosy eknomiki9 were completely inadequate for the purpose. 40. Ibid. 41. EZ, January 1991, no. 2, p. 4. 42. Ibid, p. 5 43. EZ, January 1991, no. z, p. 13. 44. EZ, February 1991, no. 7, p. 5.