Social Scientist. v 28, no. 324-325 (May-June 2000) p. 45.


Graphics file for this page
SCIENCE AND SOCIETY IN COLONIAL INDIA

Science and Culture, 1,1935, 3-4.

J.N. Sinha, Science Policy of the British in India during the Second World

War, Ph.D. Thesis, Delhi University, 1994.

This was done to accommodate the view of the Indian industrialists as outlined

in Purshottamdas Thakurdas, Plan for Economic Development for India,

Bombay, 1944 (popularly known as the Bombay Plan).

L. Amery to Linlithgow, 27 May 1942, quoted in S. Bhattacharya and B.

Zachariah, 'A Great Destiny: The British Colonial State and the Advertisement

of Post-War Reconstruction in India, 1942-45, South Asia Research, 19,

1999, 71-100.

A.V. Hill, Scientific Research in India, Royal Society, London, 1944.

Hill's speech before the East India Association, July 4,1944, Asiatic Review,

XI, Oct. 1944, 351-56.

A.V. Hill, The Ethical Dilemma of Science and Other Essays, Rockefeller

Institute Press, New York, 1960, 375.

'Notes on the utilisation of Research on show and long-term developments

in India.'J.D. Bernal Papers, MSS Add. 8287, Box 52.4.55, CUL, Cambridge.

Benjamin Zachariah, The Development of Professor Mahalanobis,' Economy

and Society, 26, 3, 1997, 434-444.

An interesting debate for and against Bombay Plan can be seen in, PC.

Malhotra and A.N. Agarwala, 'Agriculture in the Industrialists Plan'; Indian

Journal of Economics, XXV, 99, 1945, 502-510.

To quote Hill, 'When I asked one of the authors of Bombay Plan why

population was practically not mentioned in their report, he replied that his

colleagues could not agree and so had decided to leave the population problem

to God. I asked him why they did not leave industry and housing to God,

too... if public health and food are to be planned, so inevitably population

be, or all our efforts will be brought to nought.'

A.V. Hill Papers, AVHL II, 4/42, Churchill College Archive, Cambridge.

S. Gopal (ed.), Selected Works ofjawaharlal Nehru, IX, Orient Longman,

Delhi, 1976, 377-99.

In a chance meeting in Beijing in 1954, Nehru confided to J.D. Bernal:

Most of my Ministers are reactionary and scoundrels but as long as they are

my Ministers I can keep some check on them. If I were to resign they would

be the Government and they would unloose the forces that I have tried ever

since I came to power to hold in check... I have to work with people who are

actually influential with the country. They may not be the kind of people I

like but it is the best I can do.'

To this Bernal added, 'He treated the rule of a country of hundreds of millions

as if it were the management of a college in Cambridge.'

Bernal Papers, MSS. Add. 8287, Box 48, B.3, 349, CUL, Cambridge.

Science and Culture, IX, 1943, 571.

Immanuel Wallerstein, The Heritage of Sociology, The Promise of Social

Sciences,' Current Sociology, 47, 1, 1999, 1-37.

Peter Dickens, Society and Nature, Harvester, London, 1992; D. Bruun and

A. Kalland (ed.), Asian Perceptions of Nature, Curzon Press, Richmond,

1995.

Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard University Press,

Cambridge, 1993.

G.R. Keye Papers, MSS. Eur. D. 657/11, IOLR, London.



Back to Social Scientist | Back to the DSAL Page

This page was last generated on Wednesday 12 July 2017 at 18:02 by dsal@uchicago.edu
The URL of this page is: https://dsal.uchicago.edu/books/socialscientist/text.html