Social Scientist. v 3, no. 35 (June 1975) p. 59.


Graphics file for this page
NOTES 59

3 5 E Zaner in G Psatha (Eds.) Phenomenal Sociology, John \Vilcy and Sons, New York

1973. A e Beteille, op. cit., pp 96.

17 Ibid.,pp9Q.

18 Friedrich Engels, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific.

19 For an illustration, see V I Lenin, Against Dogmatism and Sectarianism in the Workings class Movement, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1965.

2 ° Beteille, op. cit.,1?? 97.

a i Ibid., pp 98.

sa Ibid.

88 Karl Marx, "India", NewYork Daily Tribune (WDT) 3790, June 9, 1853, "Sir Charle Wood's East Indian Reforms5' (WDT 3801 June 22,1853) ."The British Rule in India" (.ATDr 3804, June 25, 1853), "India^' (JVrZ)r3809,July I, 1853), "The East India Company-Its History and Results" (JVTDT 3816, July,l 1 1853) /'The Indian Question-Irish Tenant Right"(JVT.Dr3816, July 11,1853), "The Government of India" (JVr.Dr 3824, July 20,1853)<T 5065, July 15, 1857), "The Revolt in India" {NTDT 5082, August 4, 1857),"The Indian Question" (NTDT 5091, August 14, 1857), "The Indian Revolt", {NYDT 5119, September 16, 1857), "Investigation of Tortures in India" (JVT-DT 5120, September 17, 1857), 'British Incomes in India" (WDT 5123, September 21, 1857), "The Approaching Indian Loan" (WD T 5243, February 9, 1858), '-The Annexation of Oudh" (NTDT 5336, May 28, 1858), "Lord Canning's Proclamation and Land Tenure in India" (.AT.DT5344, June 7,1858), "Taxes in India" (NTDT 5383, July 23, 1858), "The Indian Bill" (NTDT 5384, July 24, 1858).

Also see Friedrich Engels, "Details of the Attack on Lucknow"(XrZ>r5333, May 25, 1858), "The British Army in India {NTDT 5361, June 26, 1858).

2 4 Marx discussed India in his various letters. For instance, see Marx and Engels, Selected Correspondence, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow 1953, pp 96, 97-99,102-104, 381, 408, 423, 502, 528.

21 See, for a set of essays concerning colonialism, Marx and Engels, On Colonialism, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1959.

28 Emmanuel Tcrray, Marxism and Primitive Society'. George Gurvitch has to his credit a number of write-ups where he has advocated strongly for a Marxist sociology.

217 Wilhelm Liebknecht op. cit., pp 53.

2 8 Beteille himself admitted in 1969 the need to abandon idealist approaches to Indian society. See concluding remarks of Andre Beteille, "The Politics of Non-Antagonistic Strata", Contributions to Indian Sociology (New Series), No 3, pp 29-39.

2 9 Beteille op. cit., pp 98-99.

»• /W..pp99.

81 S C Dube, Social Sciences in Changing Society, Ethnographic and Folk Culture Society of trP, Lucknow 1973, pp 18-19.

28 T S Simey, op. cit., pp 130.

•t Gouldner and Sprche, op. cit. 84 A Mahajan, op. cit. 8* Beteille, op. cit., pp 99.

99 For a fairly adequate exposition of dialectical materialism, see J V Stalin, Dialectical

and Historical Materialism. 87 Beteille, op. cit., pp 108. a» Ikid.,pp\06.

•• Paul Lafargue in Marx and Engels through the Eyes of Their Contemporaries, pp 23. 40 J V Stalin, Laws »f Social Development.



Back to Social Scientist | Back to the DSAL Page

This page was last generated on Wednesday 12 July 2017 at 18:02 by dsal@uchicago.edu
The URL of this page is: https://dsal.uchicago.edu/books/socialscientist/text.html