FOREIGN POLICY OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 37 Volta, Camcroun, Ivory Coast, Guinea and Chad, authoritarian mas^ parties ruled. Tn several other countries like Nepal, Morocco, Ethiopia and Saudi Arabia, authoritarian personal control was established. In other countries, like Egvpt and Burma, military oligarchies were at the helm. See Morris Janowitz, The Military in the Political Development of New Nations, Chicago 1964, pp 10-1 1. Also see Gabriel A Almond and James S Coleman (eds.) The Politic of the Developing Areas, Princeton 1960, pp 533-36. 83 See Manucl Bridier, "Notes on the Imperialist Counter-offensive" International Socialist Journal 8, 1967, p 534. Also see Danmole, op cit., p 12-13. Also sec M Fortes and E E Evans Pritchard, (^cds».) African Political Systems^ Oxford University Press, 1964 p > xx-x^i. 88 Frankcl maintains that the concept is losing its importance in the western countries but that in the new states it has become a basis for the formulation of the foreign policies. Frankel, op cit., p 19. 84 Arnold Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics, Baltimore 1962, pp 5-8. 95 For explanation of social or class content of the emergence of the modern state see Ekkehart KrippcndorIT, The State as a Focus of Peace Research, Peace Research Society Paper XVI. The Rome Conference, 1970, pp 48-50. 80 Sec Wolfers, opcit.,pp^7 87 Ibid. 88 Lagos, op cit., p 107. 8 » Ibid., pi 08. 40 Ibid. 41 Sec (a) Final Communique of the Asian-African Conference held at Bandung from 8 to 24 April, 1955; (b) Documents of the Belgrade Conference of the Heads of State or Government of Nonaligned Countries, Belgrade, GjScptember, 1961; (c) Cairo Declaration of Developing Countries, Cairo, 9-18 July 1962, and (d)LusAa Declaration of 1970. All documents are available in Mates, op cit. 42 Lagos, op cit., p 2,^.