66 SOCIAL SCIENTIST by divorcing the basis of science from the basis of life^ modern man has been able to cast a blind eye on the great potential and actual destructi-vcness of this pursuit. But not for long now. Secondly, in such a conception the antithesis between man as subject and man as object no longer appears as a controversy between determinism and voluntarism. Here again though Marx was not a self-conscious philosopher of science he certainly taught (and I quote Lukacs) that "fatalism and voluntarism are only mutually contradictory to an undfalectical and unhistorical mind. In the dialectical view of history they prove to be necessarily complementary opposites.80" 1 Bottomore (ed), Karl Marx : Early Writings, Introduction, p xiii. 2 R Aron, Main Currents of Sociological Thought, p 154. Ibid., p 150. 8 Ibid., p 150. 4 Haberrhas, Knowledge and Human Interests, p 45. 5 cf Karl Ma' . . Manuscript in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts in Bottomore e Ibid.p\57. 7 A Gouldn - Crisis of Western Sociology, p 114. 8 A Comte, T Philosophy, vol II p 937-38, London 1893. 9 Karl Marx, in 1 Bottomore (ed), op.cit, p 165. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid., p 163. 12 T Bottomore, Sociology as Social Criticism, p 75. 18 Ibid u Hartung. "The Social Function of Positivism" in Philosophy of Sciencb, Vol 12, 1945,p 131. 13 R Aron, op.cit., p 166. 16 Karl Marx, German Ideology, p 152, Lawrence and Wishart, 1974. 17 Karl Marx in T Bottomore, (ed) op.cit , p 174. ^ Ibid. 19 M Godelier, "Structure and Contradiction in Capital" in R Blackburn (ed) Ideology in Social Science, p 354. 20 Ibid., p 353. •i Ibid., p 354. 22 R Dunyaveskaya, Philosophy and Revolution, p 74. ^ Karl Marx, Capital, Vol I Ch 25, p 645. ^ Ibid., Vol II Ch 24, p 592. 25 Ibid., Vol I Ch 25, p 645. ^ Ibid. 27 Ibid., Vol I Ch26,p715. 28 Ibid., Vol I Ch 32, p 763. 29 Karl Marx, German Ideology, Theses on Feurbach: III. •