AGRARIAN ECONOMY IN TONDAIMANDALAM 39 82 Board of Revenue Proceedings, dated 29th April, 1859, Bailey and Huddleston, (1892), pp551. 88 Ibid. 84 "Decree of the Court of Sudder Adalut in Special Appeal Suit No. 101 of 1860, dated, 29th October, I860", Bailey and Huddleston (1892), pp 588-589. 85 Board of Revenue Proceedings 14th May 1856, para 5, Bailey and Huddleston (1892),p540 36 Board of Revenue, Ibid., para 8, Bailey and Huddleston (1892) p 542. 87 Board of Revenue, Ibid., para 21 Bailey and Huddleston (1892), pp 549-550. 88 Board of Revenue, Ibid., para 22, Bailey and Huddleston (1892), ibid. 89 S. lyengar (1921), op cit. 192. 90 Crole's letter to Board of Revenue dated 25th May 1875 C S Crole (1879), p. 407. 91 S. lyengar (1921), pp 194-5. 92 Board of Revenue 5th January 1818, op cit., para 106, Bailey and Huddleston (1892) p 386 ^ Despatch from Court of Directors, dated 18th August 1824, Bailey and Huddleston (1892) p. 422. 94 Munro's Minutes, op cit., para 9, Bailey and Huddleston (1892), p 439. 95 Smalley's letter to the Board of Revenue, dated 4th November 1820 Bailey and Huddleston (1892), p 397. 96 Madras Presidency to Board of Control, 30-12-1825, Revenue Despatches (preserved in the Madras Records Office) quoted by D Kumar (1965), p 71. 97 Board of Revenue Proceedings, 25-2-1830; quoted by D Kumar op citJbid. 98 D Kumar op cit. p 74. 99 Ibid. 100 Dewan Bahadur Srinivasa Raghavaiyengar (1893) pp. xxviii-xc. 101 See supra note 17.