50 SOCIAL SCIENTIST "populist" ideas which led the Mexican government in 1936 to adopt an approach similar to the Narodniki. However, from the perspective of today, Lenin's viewpoint can be objected to. Farm production, despite a seemingly forced proletarianization of the peasants, remains a consequence and reason for the expansion of the internal market, since capital has <1 found" means and ways of making better use of it than the generalization of agricultural wage labour. Lenin did not consider the peculiarity of agricultural production as against industrial production. His analysis was also based on the thesis of an unlimited generalization of the wagelabour-capital relationship. 5 Michel Gutelmann, Reforme et mystification agraires en Amerique latine: Le cas du Mexigue, Paris, 1971. 6 Agricultural Credit, Sector Policy Paper, World Bank, May 1975, p 20. 7 Lcster R Brown, Seeds of Change, New York, 1970, p 56. p Agricultural Credit, op cit, p 40. ^ Ibid, p 41. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid, p 9. 12 Ibid. 18 Ibid. 14 Ibid. 15 Ibid. 36 Ibid, p 43. 17 Comite d'information Sahel, Qui se nourrit de la famine en Afrique?, Paris, 1975. 1B Agricultural Credit, op cit. 19 Folker Frobel, Jurgen Heinrichs und Otto Kreye, Die neue internationals Arbeitstei-lung, Reinbeck bei; Hamburg, 1977. 20 Kostas Vegopoulos, "Capitalisme dinbrme fla cas de F agriculture dans le capita-lisme)", in Samir Amin und ders, La question pay sanne et le capitalisme, Paris, 1974. 21 Martinez Alter, "Un edificio capitalista con una fachada feudal?", in cuadernos del ruedo iberico, 1967. \ 22 Marco Antonio Duran, "Los problemas agrarios mexicanos", Revista del Mexico Agrario, No 3, 1968. 23 Shiomo Eckstein, Gordon Donald,Douglas Hortun and Thomas Carroll, Landreform in Latin America: Bolivien, Chile, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela, World Bank Staff Working Paper, No 275, April 1978. 2-t Ibid.pp 113-114. ^ Ibid, pp 116-117. ^ Ibid. 27 Ibid, p 118. 28 Refer Bennholdt-Thomsen, "Problemas en el analisis de clases del sector agrario en paises dependientes", op cit. 29 Lester R Brown, By Bread Alone, New York/Washington, 1974, p 214. 30 Claude Servolin, ^-/absorption de Fagriculture dans le mode de production capita-liste", Cashier de la Foundation Naticnale de Sciences Politiques, No 184, 1972, p 125. hl Holis Ghenery, Monte S Ahluwa'lia, C L G Bell, John H Duloy and Richard Jolly, Redistribution with Growth, Oxford; 1974. y2 On the basis of a study on Sudan ^manuscript 1978) Tetzlaff points out how and in which way the coexistence of various types of production can be functional for the total capitalist interests. The six-year plan, beginning in 1977, reflects again the strategy of the World Bank. Tetzlaff divides the agricultural structure in Sudan into four indeal-typical "farming systems": 1) The state regulated irrigation agriculture; 2) the often private but also state managed large-scale mechanized agriculture without artificial irrigation'("mechanized rain-fed farming''); 3) the traditional subsistence agriculture of "shifting cultivation" which includes the occassional production of cash crops; 4) the traditional cattle rearing, based mainly on nomadism and scminomadism. Analysing the connection among these four types,