When freedom came to the peoples of South Asia in 1947 and 1948 the per- ceptions of their probable future assumed a diversity of forms. Some students of the region foresaw a long period of unremitting communal strife, ending perhaps in the forcible reabsorption of Pakistan into the Indian nation; others saw in the partition of the subcontinent the beginnings of a continuing process of Balkaniza- tion along religious and linguistic lines; there were those who predicted that in the absence of British guidance the economic and political order would soon lapse into a state of perennial chaos; and, finally, there were many who saw in freedom the key to the steady advance of democracy, welfare, and social justice. Events have proved that none of these views was accurate. It is, in fact, difficult from the vantage point of the present to discern any single strand running clearly though the most recent decades of South Asian history.
In this section of the atlas we focus on the political history of the post-indepen- dence period, touching occasionally on social, cultural, and economic issues that bear directly on political events. For a more extensive treatment of social, cultural, and economic evolution, stressing process rather than event, the reader is directed to sections X and XI, in which developments over the past century are cartographi- cally documented.
The terminal dates of specific maps or map series of this section range from 1970 to 1975. Since this atlas was prepared over a twelve-year period, the termi- nal date of a particular map may in certain instances reflect the latest information available at the time its compilation was completed and the subsequent ease or difficulty of updating it before surrendering the work to the printer. Regrettably, on certain maps, which already bore a very heavy information load, late revisions we wished to make proved unfeasible, while the excessive crowding of others largely reflects the obtrusion of unanticipated events between the planning and the execution of the work. At the conclusion of the atlas text, under the heading "Late Particulars," we have added some of the major happenings of the last few years not shown in this section.
The first three map plates of this section, subsection IX.A, deal with internal territorial and administrative changes in South Asia since 1947. Subsection IX.B depicts the results of every significant election at the national level or, in India and
The documentation for the events of the post-independence era is voluminous and, despite the fact that on many issues much of the available literature is slanted to convey a partisan point of view, reliable neutral sources can normally be found to provide the factual basis for the maps in this section. Government maps and documents, various news digests, and newspapers themselves have provided the bulk of the material used in map compilations; the comprehension of the mate- rials, however, entailed considerable study of journal articles and longer mono- graphic works.
Ahmad, Mushtaq. Government and politics in Pakistan, 3d ed. Karachi, 1970.
Asian Recorder, New Delhi, 1955–.
Brown, W. Norman. The United States and India, Pakistan, Bangladesh (3d rev. ed. of The United States and India and Pakistan). Cambridge, Mass., 1972.
Burke, Samuel M. Mainsprings of Indian and Pakistani foreign policies, Minne- apolis, Minn., 1974.
Callard, Keith B. Pakistan: A political study. New York, 1957.
Dupree, Louis. Afghanistan. Princeton, N.J., 1973.
Facts on file. New York, various years.
Harrison, Selig. India: The most dangerous decades. Princeton, N.J., 1966.
Keesing's contemporary archives. London, various years.
Morris-Jones, W. H. The government and politics of India. New York, 1967.
Wilson, A. Jeyaratnam. Politics in Sri Lanka, 1947–1973. London, 1974.
Wriggins, W. Howard. Ceylon: Dilemmas of a new nation. Princeton, N.J., 1960.
IX.A.1 and 2. Territorial Changes from 1947 to 1975; Political Structure under the Indian Constitution of 1950 and the Pakistani Constitution of 1962
The political map inherited by India and Pakistan as they began their independent existence was one of almost incredible complexity (cf. plate VIII.D.1). Provinces varied enormously in both size and population, and in the more than six hundred princely states the variability was even greater. States like Gwalior, Indore, and Baroda consisted of numerous discon- tiguous and often widely separated parcels of territory. Simi- larly, most states agencies and several provinces did not consist of a single continuous area, and many were punctuated by enclaves under another political jurisdiction. The lack of com- pactness in the shape of other provinces which were continuous (e.g., Madras), gave rise to administrative inefficiencies and to a sense of neglect on the part of people living in the more peripheral areas. But, most important, in few provinces was there any popular sentiment of linguistic and cultural cohe- sion. Three major languages, for example, were widely spoken in Madras and in Bombay, each in a different region, and four in Hyderabad (which did not, however, become a part of India until November 1949). Finally, encysted within the territory of India were a number of relics of colonialism in the form of
Two phases of change in the reshaping of the political map may conveniently be recognized, one before the Indian States Reorganization in 1956 (plate IX.A.1), the other from the reorganization itself to the present (plate IX.A.2). In the for- mer period emphasis was laid on absorbing into India and Pakistan the princely states within their respective territories and, in many cases, on consolidating petty states into larger, more viable political groupings or absorbing them into border- ing provinces. These changes had for all practical purposes been completed in India by 25 January 1950, the date when its new, republican constitution went into effect. Three classes of states were created by that constitution: Part A states, formed essentially from the former provinces of British India, except for small provinces governed by chief-commissioners; Part B states, formed essentially from single large princely states (e.g., Hyderabad, Mysore) or merged groups of former princely states (e.g., Rajasthan, Saurashtra); and Part C states, with a large degree of central control, formed from former chief-commissioner's provinces (e.g., Delhi, Coorg) or smaller princely states that could not be conveniently merged with others to join Part B states (e.g., Bhopal, Manipur). Addition-
In September 1956, following the recommendations of the State Reorganization Commission (established in 1953) In- dia's map underwent a fundamental reorganization. The dis- tinctions among Part A, B, and C states were abolished and that between a single class of "states" and less politically com- petent "union territories" took its place. Not counting tribal minority regions, most of the post-1956 states consisted of a single territory with a high degree of linguistic homogeneity and contained no significant linguistic minority areas in which one of the major languages specified in the constitution was spoken. The two major exceptions were the bilingual states of Bombay and Punjab; but there, too, separatist agitation (see plate IX.D.1, map (a)) ultimately led to linguistic partition, in 1960 and 1966 respectively. (The Punjabi case was par- ticularly complicated in that the distinction between Punjabi