Social Scientist. v 9, no. 101-02 (Dec-Jan 1899) p. 82.


Graphics file for this page
82 SOCIAL SCIENTIST

rupture .... The experiences of the liberated zones constitute precious patrimony for us. Something which we have to defend and use to make a rupture, at the national level, with the old myths, values and habits, with the structures of social life, organisation and production inherited from the colonial list society and which still exist in our midst.

There is also another interesting fact which needs particular mention. Samora Machcl says:

The fact that you have been brought up in the liberated zone—that you have never seen a colonialist—docs not make you a New Man. Perhaps the contrary, because you have not gone through the process of rejection. You have not been immunized against the old society. The New Man is essentially only formed by remaining committed to struggle.. .. The New Man is born in struggle, at all stages; with a new mentality, acquired through struggle, the New Man becomes an agent of transformation and activization for social relations of a new type which will characterise the new society in all fields—production, education, culture, leadership structures, and relations with the grassroots in every field .... To create such an outlook requires internal struggle which has to be systematic and organised. Not sporadic, spontaneous, emo-ional but consciously planned, scientific and systematic. But this can no longer be an individual struggle. There is no such thing as individual victory—only collective victory. When we speak of internal struggle this means rejecting the old values which everyone had absorbed to a greater or lesser extent— rejecting racism, tribalism regionalism, egoism, elitism, all the various forms of subjectivism. In general we sec this as a collective struggle that has to take place at the level of society and nature, as well as the individual level.

In regard to struggles going on across the Mozambique's borders in South Africa we have only to concur with Samora Machel again when he says: "We arc the most obdurate and uncompromising enemies of racism. But we also feel that by putting too much stress on the apartheid issue the danger is that revolutionary forces may be diverted into waging an anti-white campaign. That is why we say let us define the enemy. It is not the whites;

it is not a question of skin pigmentation. It is, in our area of the world, colonialist capitalist opprcassion."

That these were no idle words was demonstrated by concrete acts of support for the Zimbabwe freedom fighters—for which



Back to Social Scientist | Back to the DSAL Page

This page was last generated on Wednesday 12 July 2017 at 18:02 by dsal@uchicago.edu
The URL of this page is: https://dsal.uchicago.edu/books/socialscientist/text.html